摘要
目的 分析在冠心病的护理中采用优质护理干预后的护理效果。方法 选择2020年3月至2021年3月作为本次研究的研究时段，在此一年间我院收治的冠心病98名作为本次研究的研究对象。按照随机数字表法分为两组，为对照组与干预组，对照组录入49名，干预组录入49名。对所有冠心病病患都采取护理干预，其中对照组使用常规护理方式，干预组在对照组常规护理的基础上使用优质护理模式干预。观察对比两组冠心病病患通过为期1个月的护理后的冠心病患者不良情绪、患者生存质量、护理满意度、身体各项指标进行收集对比分析。结果 通过不同护理方式进行护理后，干预组的冠心病病患术后不良情（SDS抑郁评分、SAS焦虑评分）低于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；同时干预组冠心病病患术后生存质量高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；从护理满意度方面看，干预组经过优质护理后护理满意度明显优于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）；身体各项指标对比，干预组血压、血糖、胆固醇正常率均高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论 在对冠心病病患护理时，采用优质护理管理的方式进行疾病护理，能够提高冠心病患者生存质量，同时能够降低心绞痛冠心病患者术后不良情绪发生，提升护理满意度，值得推广。
关键词： 优质护理；冠心病；SDS；SAS
Abstract
Objective To analyze the nursing effect of high-quality nursing intervention in the nursing of coronary heart disease. Methods The period from March 2020 to March 2021 was selected as the research period of this study, and 98 patients with coronary heart disease treated in our hospital during this one year were selected as the research objects of this study. According to the random number table method, they were divided into two groups, the control group and the intervention group, 49 people in the control group and 49 people in the intervention group. Nursing intervention was adopted for all coronary heart disease patients. The control group used routine nursing, and the intervention group used high-quality nursing mode based on the routine nursing of the control group. Observation and comparison of coronary heart disease patients in the two groups were collected and compared with various indicators of coronary heart disease patients' adverse emotions, patients' quality of life, nursing satisfaction, and physical indicators after one-month nursing. Results After nursing with different nursing methods, the postoperative adverse conditions (SDS depression score and SAS anxiety score) of patients with coronary heart disease in the intervention group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The postoperative quality of life of patients with heart disease was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). From the perspective of nursing satisfaction, the nursing satisfaction of the intervention group after high-quality nursing was significantly better than that of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant Compared with the physical indicators, the normal rates of blood pressure, blood sugar and cholesterol in the intervention group were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion In the nursing of patients with coronary heart disease, adopting high-quality nursing management for disease nursing can improve the quality of life of patients with coronary heart disease, and at the same time can reduce the occurrence of postoperative adverse emotions in patients with angina pectoris and coronary heart disease, and improve nursing satisfaction, which is worthy of promotion.
Key words： Quality Nursing; Coronary Heart Disease; SDS; SAS
参考文献 References
[1] 李雯. 冠心病心绞痛患者实施优质护理干预的效果[J]. 继续医学教育, 2022, 36(2):4.
[2] 郭红婧. 优质护理干预用于冠心病心绞痛护理中的效果分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(33):2.
[3] 朱彩霞. 优质护理干预在冠心病临床中的效果分析[J]. 中国城乡企业卫生, 2020, 35(11):3.
[4] 徐丽春. 优质护理干预对冠心病患者心绞痛发生情况及护理满意度的影响[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(6):2.
[5] 朱丽. 冠心病心绞痛患者实施优质护理干预的效果及意义[J]. 中国医药指南, 2021, 19(15):2.
[6] 王钰. 优质护理对冠心病患者的干预效果分析[J]. 航空航天医学杂志, 2021, 32(4):2.
[7] 王友丽. 优质护理干预老年冠心病患者的护理观察效果分析[J]. 中国医药指南, 2020, 18(16):2.
[8] 朱宗梅. 分析研究在冠心病的临床护理中实施优质护理干预的应用效果[J]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2020, 7(16):1.
[9] 黄汝兰, 陈彩仙, 张雪春,等. 冠心病患者的优质护理干预效果观察[J]. 按摩与康复医学, 2020, 11(14):2.
[10] 李燕, 王承竹, 卢英荣,等. 优质护理在冠心病护理中的应用效果分析[J]. 首都食品与医药, 2020, 27(5):1.
[11] 孙元彩. 优质护理在冠心病患者中的作用分析[J]. 中国农村卫生, 2020, 12(14):1.
[12] 门瑞英. 优质护理在冠心病护理中的应用体会[J]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2020, 8(9):2.