摘要
目的 研究支气管哮喘患儿使用延续护理模式的效果。方法 选择2017年1月—2019年1月在我院治疗的支气管哮喘患儿96例作为对象随机分成对照组和观察组,每组各48例,对照组使用常规护理模式,观察组在对照组基础上使用延续护理模式,对比两组实际效果。结果 观察组患儿的哮喘发作次数、感冒次数及住院次数明显低于对照组患儿,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患儿的 FVC、FEV1及PEF明显优于对照组患儿,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患儿规律服药、康复锻炼、合理饮食及定时复诊的依从性高于对照组患儿,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);出院后观察组患儿的各项生活质量评分明显高于对照组患儿,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 延续性护理在小儿支气缓解期管哮喘患者中的应用价值高,可提高患者用药和运动锻炼依从性,控制哮喘发作,提高患者生活质量和满意度。
关键词: 延续性护理;支气管哮喘;效果;影响
Abstract
Objective To study the effect of continuous nursing mode on children with bronchial asthma. Methods 96 children with bronchial asthma who were treated in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were selected as the subjects and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 48 cases in each group. Based on the continuous nursing model, the actual effects of the two groups were compared. Results The number of asthma attacks, the number of colds and the number of hospitalizations in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The FVC, FEV1 and PEF of the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group. Children in the observation group had a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) ; the compliance of children in the observation group with regular medication, rehabilitation exercise, reasonable diet and regular follow-up visits was higher than that of the children in the control group (P<0.05); discharge from hospital The quality of life scores of the children in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Continuous nursing has high application value in children with asthma in bronchial remission, which can improve the compliance of patients with medication and exercise, control asthma attacks, and improve the quality of life and satisfaction of patients.
Key words: Continuous nursing; Bronchial asthma; Effect; Influence
参考文献 References
[1] 靳爱红.支气管哮喘患儿的护理[J].护理研究,2010,24(2):52-53.
[2] 高俊俊,靳艳,张铭利.延续性护理的国内外研究现状及展望[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2016,23(8):16-17.
[3] 王霞,林芳,庞媛媛.医院延续性护理的应用现状[J].护理实践与研究,2018,15(04):18-20.
[4] 刘蕊,刘丽晓.延续性护理干预在支气管哮喘患者自我管理行为及疾病控制中的应用[J].中国民康医学,2016,28(15):69-71.
[5] 郑鸿,李芸.儿童生命质量研究进展[J].护理研究,2002,16(7) :382-384.
[6] 郭莉媛.院外延续性护理对支气管哮喘患儿再入院率的影响[J].医学信息,2015,28(8):185-186.
[7] 张银枝.延续性护理对预防支气管哮喘复发的效果分析[J].饮食保健,2016,3(8):167-168.
[8] 陈立新,徐浩.延续性护理干预对反复呼吸道感染儿童及家长的影响[J].中国医药导报,2018,15(01):159-162.
[9] 沈淑芬,陈冰玉,汤萍.基于动机性访谈对反复呼吸道感染患儿开展延续性护理的效果观察[J].护理管理杂志,2015,15(01):57-59.
[10] 陆静,余清萍,彭红,李娅.个体化电话随访模式在日间手术患者术后延续性护理中的应用[J].当代护士(下旬刊),2018,25(03):92-93.
[11] 冯海艳,刘丽媛,薛晴.微信平台对高血压病患者进行延续性护理的效果影响[J].当代护士(上旬刊),2018,25(01):46-48.
[12] 文萍,白永旗,赵南霜,雷小琴.持续护理对学龄期支气管哮喘缓解期患儿预后的干预效果[J].解放军护理杂志,2017,34(13):30-33.